We haven’t changed even after several
millennia from when we first started calling ourselves civilized. We’re still
roughly the same old primates that are only slightly evolved than the
domesticated dog. We’re still the same physical, visual creatures that depend
on how something or someone looks like, no matter how much we insist that we
don’t. It’s probably some gene we haven’t been able to evolve out of just yet.
Why do people still put such a high premium
on the physical beauty? I thought we’re already past that stage in human
history. Every bit of thing that surrounds me now, proves otherwise.
Let’s start with the type of people that
litter the streets. All of them would either come from just two categories: the
physically beautiful, and those trying hard to be physically beautiful. We have
those who are born with charismatic features, clear skin, pretty faces,
magazine-inspired physique (should it be the other way around). On the other
hand, we have the opposites or the ‘almost but not quite’ who in turn make up
through designer clothes, thick but supposed to be natural-looking makeup,
expensive accessories and even shiny new cars. If one has both the luck of
inheriting the traits of their supermodel ancestors and the extravagant wealth
of their parents – then all the more welcomed they are in this world and the
people around them. If one was unfortunate enough to lack both – then they’d
have to toil their way to acceptance.
Beauty and physical attractiveness is a requirement
now, one that is becoming increasingly demanding and expensive yet bearing more
weight than the other aspects of humanity.
One would always argue that it’s just
natural to want to look attractive. Some would even say that their efforts are
more for their health and maximizing their life. That’s just a white lie,
trying to cover the real reason: we are all vain no matter how much we deny it.
We’re all just children of vanity, the same smugness that has existed a few
thousands of years ago. It’s still here.
So, who wants to be called ugly or surround
himself with ugly things and the not-so-good looking? (Well, unless you intend
to use them to highlight yourself). No
one does, of course. I don’t.
But that is just the thing, since the
question is indicative of how biased we see things. We still have a very strong
sense of what is beautiful and what is not. This judgment is mainly based on
how things look and nothing else.
We may fill our heads with multimedia
holding concepts of inner beauty and the heart being so much more than the
looks, but we’re still far away from being what we claim to be: evolved beyond
the physical beauty.
It’s either this is something we’ve barely
achieved or this is really just something that is an integral part of humanity.
---------
2010-11-29
Comments
Post a Comment